I SALUTE Peter McNabb for having the courage to express his opinion on the Brexit aftermath.

Sadly however, his letter expresses all the characteristics of those who voted to remain and want a second referendum because they lost the first.

In my previous letter I pleaded for Remoaners to argue their opinion with more real facts and less invention.

In this Peter McNabb has failed.

Two thirds of his letter is predominantly speculation and invention with the rest a total misunderstanding of the difference between leaving the EU and actions which are either consequential or desirable.

Everyone is entitled to their own alternative opinion but is Peter McNabb suggesting I should automatically agree with their opinion or is he suggesting that the opinions of Brexit Remainers are above criticism.

He states that the leaving process from the EU is extremely complex and gives an extensive list of issues involved. Perhaps he can tell us which of these issues are essential to be dealt with before we are allowed to leave the EU.

I can tell him in one word - none.

The issues he mentions may or may not be necessary to be dealt with at some time but they do not have to be dealt with before leaving the EU.

Indeed the EU politicians are currently saying that they will not discuss a trade deal until the UK has actually left the EU. If the EU continues to be intransigent in what they will discuss the UK may have no other option than to walk away. The only reason the political Remainers are saying “complexity, complexity” is another futile attempt to delay the process.

Finally I would like to tell you of the perceived view of Remainers arrogance and indeed illogical stupidity.

Firstly the remainer political class in their attempt to have a replay, say that those who voted to leave were too thick to understand the question. A question I seem to recall had a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer.

Secondly they invent the term ‘soft Brexit’, which in practice means not leaving the EU at all. At the same time in an attempt to delay the process they claim the process is so complex it will take years to conclude before we leave.

Thirdly they then say there should be a final referendum on the ‘deal’ resulting from these invented extremely complex issues.

Now if we who voted leave were too thick (the view of the remainers) to understand a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ question how are they expected to understand the ‘deal’ relating to multiple complex issues that had taken years for experts to assess?

Don Micklewright Weaverham