Send us news by text, start your message Cheshire News and your send photos and videos to 80360
12:00pm Saturday 16th January 2010
CAMPAIGNERS and developers are expected to clash in the coming weeks as the Middlewich incinerator fight intensifies for 2010.
Bosses at Cheshire East Council have placed an advert in this week’s Guardian asking residents to have their say on the proposal within 21 days.
This means a decision could be made on the fiercely-contested plans for an ‘energy-from waste’ plant at Midpoint 18 business park in months.
Cheshire East initially placed an advert in an earlier edition of the Guardian asking people to comment by January 19.
But Cheshire Anti-incinerator Network (CHAIN) complained saying information about the incinerator on the authority’s website was difficult to find and a hard copy was not available.
“We were criticised and probably quite justifiably,” said Steve Molloy, who specialises in minerals and waste for Cheshire East’s planning department.
“We’re now advertising where to find the information and where the fall back is. We need to see what manor of response we get back.”
A hard copy of Covanta’s plans is now available in Middlewich Library, in Lewin Street.
Liam Byrne, spokesman for CHAIN, said that the opposition campaign will intensify this year.
He added: “We would like to thank the people of Middlewich who have given their support over the last year.
“This was demonstrated by 60 per cent of the population who signed a petition against the incinerator and a Guardian poll that revealed that nine out of 10 people are against the plans.
“We know that Covanta bosses in New Jersey have been rattled by the extent of the local opposition which they did not expect.
“Looking forward to 2010 their loyalty and support will be even more important, not least because we expect Covanta to launch a propaganda blitzkrieg in the New Year.”
Meanwhile, Covanta has distributed a newsletter to every home in Middlewich.
It outlines the company’s application being given the all clear on health and environment issues from a number consultees and Covanta’s pledge to deal only with Cheshire’s waste.
The letter also details the firm’s promise to provide £2.5 million towards the completion of the eastern bypass.
Malcolm Chilton, managing director of Covanta, said: “We have been working very hard to provide Cheshire East with additional information that has been requested through the consultation process.
“Such requests are quite normal for an application of this nature and complexity, and it is our view that the issues raised have now been successfully resolved.”
- Cheshire East Council is inviting residents to have their say on the controversial plans by emailing planning@cheshireeast.gov.uk and writing to the authority at Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach.
All comments submitted before the council’s planning committee makes it final decision in the coming months will be considered.
But people are encouraged to get in touch with the authority by early February.
- To view Covanta’s newsletter online, covantaenergy.co.uk/site/cheshire
biker 1, middlewich says...
7:45pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Want to share your opinion, leave a tribute or comment on a news story? It's easy!
You can register for free here and comment on any of our stories.
Your news, Your views.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Middlewich
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Middlewich
Search Now »
Steve Tea, middlewich says...
12:32pm Sat 16 Jan 10
What other councils are doing?
Surrey County Council has dropped plans for two controversial incinerators. One reason given for this dramatic change of policy is that quantities of waste arising have fallen. Surrey will now concentrate its efforts (and its budget) waste minimisation, increasing recycling and treating food waste using anaerobic digestion (AD).
Dorset council withdrew a request to the government for £80m in PFI funding in December, saying that falling residual waste meant it could no longer justify being tied into a long-term contract. The reference technology for the project was an 115,000t/year incinerator.
Hull and East Riding councils have also dropped a PFI bid recently, although on financial grounds. Another, by three councils in Bedfordshire, has been undermined by two of them withdrawing. Bedford and Luton both cited the scheme’s cost.
Viridor is appealing against the Oxfordshire County Council (OCC) Planning Committee decision to reject the proposed Ardley incinerator.
Before the Planning Committee sat down to consider the application, the Government Office for the East Midlands (GOEM) issued the following direction:In exercise of his powers under Article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995, the Secretary of State hereby directs your council not to grant planning permission for this application without special authorisation. This Direction is issued to give the Government Office a further period in which to consider the proposals.
According to Ricky Knight, a Barnstaple town councillor and member of Devon Residents Against Incinerators (DRAIN):Devon County Council have ‘mothballed’ plans to build an incinerator at Seven Brethren Bank, Barnstaple.
In a statement released by Emma Gorringe, the Media Officer for Central Bedfordshire Council, we read that:On the 7 December, Luton Borough Council’s Executive Committee made the unexpected decision to withdraw from the Bedfordshire Energy and Recycling (BEaR) Project.
Alternatives to burning, Recycling according East Cheshires own statistics this is increasing, Autoclaving and Anaerobic digestion.
Look at the alternatives instead of blighting our lives. A public enquiry in Sheffield claimed it was acceptable that up 30 people will a year due to the incinertor. How can this be acceptable?