News RSS Feed


Want to share your opinion, leave a tribute or comment on a news story? It's easy!

You can register for free here and comment on any of our stories.

Your news, Your views.

Second blow for 'silly' incinerator


CONTROVERSIAL plans for an incinerator in Middlewich were dealt another blow last week.

Councillors from Cheshire West and Chester Council (CWAC) voted unanimously against Covanta’s proposals for an ‘Energy from waste’ plant at Midpoint 18 business park, last Tuesday.

As a neighbouring authority, CWAC’s planning board is acting as a consultee to Cheshire East Council, which will ultimately decide the application’s fate.

The development comes just weeks after Middlewich Town Council recommended the incinerator for refusal.

Clr Mike Parsons, of Middlewich Town Council, said: “That’s excellent news. It really says something when the area that’s not going to be directly affected by the incinerator objects to it.

“If Cheshire East, for whatever reason, feels it cannot support that decision, it will be a very sad day.”

The proposed incinerator will be capable of handling 370,000 tonnes of waste a year.

At the meeting, CWAC councillors discussed a report that stated that around 185,000 tonnes of waste would be extracted for recycling.

The remaining waste would be burned to produce steam to generate 35 megawatts of electricity – enough to power 50,000 homes.

Other nearby businesses like British Salt are set to benefit from the possibility of exporting steam.

But the planning board members were not satisfied that there was enough information for an effective assessment to be made regarding the impact on air quality on the busy A54, which would be used by hundreds of lorries if the plant went ahead.

Malcolm Chilton, managing director of Covanta, was disappointed that the application was objected to on the basis of ‘insufficient information’ and wanted the decision to be deferred.

He said: “This would have allowed council officers to request any further information they might wish to see and to allow a full assessment of the application.”

Like Middlewich Town Council, the CWAC councillors also agreed that Covanta’s plans could be contrary to the Waste Local Plan.

After the meeting, planning board chairman Andrew Storrar added: “The plant would not be processing Cheshire waste but would be bringing it in from outside the area.

“This is contrary to the Waste Local Plan which aims to meet the needs of Cheshire’s population and businesses rather than serve a much wider area.

“Also air quality along the A54 is extremely important for local people. It is estimated that of the 292 journeys in and out of the plant each day, 156 of these would be made along the A54.

“These additional lorry movements could have a detrimental effect on air quality.”

But Mr Chiltern said: “Covanta’s proposed facility meets the need to manage Cheshire’s waste in a sustainable way.

“We have demonstrated, using data provided by Cheshire’s Waste Local Plan, that there is sufficient waste within Cheshire to fuel our plant and significantly reduce the need for new landfills.”

Cheshire Anti-incinerator Network (CHAIN) has also welcomed the news.

Chairman Brian Cartwright, who spoke at the meeting, said: “We were very gratified that again common sense prevailed and Cheshire West has come out against this silly proposal by Covanta.“Cheshire West and Cheshire East have got to act as one voice so I’m treating this as a very good sign.”

Clr Parsons added: “No one’s daft – we know there needs to be a solution on waste but there are safer ways of treating it.

“At the end of the day, no one will know the full impact of incinerators and the health risks attached for about another 30 years.

“There’s too many unknowns and for that reason, we shouldn’t be meddling with it.”


Your Say YourGuardian

Michael Ryan, Shrewsbury says...
4:57pm Wed 1 Jul 09

I've examined infant mortality rates at electoral ward level around incinerators and found very high rates where exposure to PM2.5 emissions is high.

Dawn Shanafelt, of Saginaw County, is helping to identify causes of high infant deaths in Michigan & read this extract from the Saginaw News of 27 April 2009:

Saginaw County infant mortality rate above state average
by Jill Armentrout | The Saginaw News
Monday April 27, 2009, 11:09 AM

Twenty-six babies died before their first birthdays in Saginaw County in 2007, equating to an infant mortality rate here that continues to surpass the state average.

The county's rate of infant deaths was 10.5 per 1,000 births, compared to a statewide rate of 8 deaths per 1,000 births. The national Healthy People 2010 goal is 4.5 deaths per 1,000 births.

"Infant deaths are a barometer for the health of the entire community," said Dawn Shanafelt, community health section supervisor for the Saginaw County Health Department. "If we can't protect our babies, we have a huge problem."....continu
es - complete with map!

Kind regards,


Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury

Michael Ryan, Shrewsbury says...
4:58pm Wed 1 Jul 09

Here's my Western Mail letter of 17 June 2009:

The Western Mail: Incinerators linked to neonatal deaths
Western Mail (Cardiff, Wales) - Wednesday, June 17, 2009
SIR - When I read about the mapping of infant death rates in Saginaw, Michigan, I wondered why no such initiative had been carried out here in the UK.

When I looked at the infant mortality rates in London's 625 electoral wards for 2002-07, I saw that 11 of the 16 wards which had very high infant death rates, ranging from 11.0 to 13.9 per 1,000 live births, were either wholly or partially within two miles of an incinerator .

Fourteen of London's electoral wards had zero infant deaths recorded in the same six-year period and none of these "zero infant death wards" were within two miles of any incinerator .

Dawn Shanafelt, of Saginaw County Health Department, summed everything up in the Saginaw News for April 27: " Infant deaths are a barometer for the health of the entire community." Shanafelt, a community health section supervisor, continued: "If we can't protect our babies, we have a huge problem." Our baby girl would have been 24 years old next month. If the above research had been carried out 30 years ago she might have been alive today instead of dying at 14 weeks.

MICHAEL RYAN Bicton Heath, Shrewsbury

Steve Tea, middlewich says...
8:57pm Fri 3 Jul 09

292 journeys in and out of the plant each day creating more pollution, more congestion and loose rubbish blowing off the back of lorries.

Covanta, you are creating an eyesore, pollution and accident waiting to happen.

Comments are closed on this article.


Local advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »